Thus, SWAN is not a like Wikipedia because several "hypotheses" (consistent or inconsistent) can co-exist. to be more precise I would say that the SWAN ontology is an ontology for modeling scientific discourse. Thus, I would define discourse elements as key entities in the SWAN ecosystem. They represent the hubs of the scientific discourse, or in general of the discourse.
Figure 1 - Walsh Hypothesis in the SWAN browser
Looking at fig. 1 it is possible to see the title of the Hypothesis, a description, the authors of such hypothesis (in this case the authors are the authors of the journal article the hypothesis has been derived from). Then, after the journal article used as source of the informatin related to the hypothesis we have the contained discourse elements. Right, a hypothesis can contain a list of discourse elements. In this case we have a list of claims (scientifically proved discourse elements) but it is possible to have in the discourse elements list other hypothesis, research questions or comments...
The SWAN Team: Tim Clark, June Kinoshita, Paolo Ciccarese, Marco Ocana, Gwen Wong, Elizabeth Wu.
No comments:
Post a Comment